The Pegasus Award, what it is, and what it isn't
Friday, 1 June 2012 13:02It's that time again! The nominating ballot for the Pegasus Awards is up. What's the Pegasus? The Pegasus is an award created by the filk community, to honor and recognize excellence within the community.
From the ballot itself:
By the same token, voters should also be participating members of the filk community.
There are any number of amazing, delightul nerdy, geeky musicians around these days. Are those musicians members of the filk community? They are, if they consider themselves to be. If they don't consider themselves to be, then they're not.
What about you? Are you a member of the filk community? I think you are, if you consider yourself to be. We don't have a member roll, we don't have dues, we don't have a minimum time or attendance requirement, you don't have to sing or play an instrument or make an album. The highest principle we hold is that everyone is welcome and no one is excluded. You just have to genuinely want to be part of the community of people who share filk music.
It's important to remember that "filk" isn't simply a synonym for "geek music". Filk is so much more than just a genre of music. Filk is people. ("It's peeeeoplllllle!" er, ahem.)
Here's a post that I wrote a while back on the filk community, the Pegasus Awards, and what they mean to me.
From that post:
It's important to me that the Pegasus Award remain what it was intended to be: an award given by the filk community in recognition of its members. That's tricky, because membership isn't restricted, as with an organization like SFWA. The filk community isn't an official organization; it's just a community of people, open to anyone who wants to be in it, and that means the ballot has to be an open ballot, or else we'd be betraying our own principles. So we're basically on the honor system.
Let's use the Hugos as an example, because they're coming up too. Let's say I wrote a short story that's up for a Hugo. I'd be totally comfortable going on Twitter and saying "Everyone vote for my story for a Hugo because it's awesome!" Why? Because the Hugo is an award *meant* to be awarded to the work with the most SF fans who think it's awesome. Hopefully all the voters are *reading* all the entries, but given that, the Hugo is intended to be voted on by all SF fans, worldwide. There's nothing wrong with that kind of award. That's how it's defined.
I would not, however, go on Twitter and say "Everyone vote for my song for a Pegasus because it's awesome!" Because the Pegasus is not meant to be awarded to the song/band with the most fans worldwide who think it's awesome. I have fans who are not members of the filk community. If I start campaigning on the internet at large, then I may get votes from people who a) have never heard of and b) don't care about the filk community. Even if they are dutifully listening to all the song samples before voting, it's still not okay, because the Pegasus is not that kind of award and that's not how it's defined.
Those people would mean well! They'd just be trying to express their love for one musician/band! But they'd inadvertently be taking the award away from the community that created it and from its intended purpose.
The Pegasus is not an award for the nerd-band with the most fans. It's not the Grammies of geek-music. It's a community award, and it's meant to be both voted on by and bestowed upon community members. It's meant to represent the collective voice of the filk community.
If you love a geek musician's work and you're not sure whether they're filkers, then hey, why not ask them? "Do you consider yourself a member of the filk community?" If their answer is no (or if their answer is "huh?"), then please consider not nominating them for a Pegasus and not campaigning to get their fans to vote.
I believe the key here is self-identifying. Jonathan Coulton, for an obvious example, isn't a filker-- not so much because he's a professional musician, in my opinion, but because he specifically does not self-identify as a member of the filk community. (I do mean specifically. as I understand it he's been invited to filk cons and has politely declined.) Being a professional doesn't mean you're not a filker; there are lots of working musicians who are a part of the community and have been honored by it. Heather Dale & Ben Deschamps. Tom Smith. Chris Conway. Wild Mercy. Many more. Some are even in the Filk Hall of Fame (an award for long-term contributions to the filk community, not primarily in terms of performing.)
If you're not sure whether you're a filker, there's nobody to ask but yourself. I don't get to answer for you and neither does anyone else. Have you been to any filk cons or filk circles or house filks? Have you really wanted to go to one even though you haven't been able to yet? Do you hang out with, or listen to music by, or play music with, or help organize & support, people who consider themselves filkers? Do you genuinely want to be part of the filk community?
If you want to, then I say welcome! If you don't want to, then that's okay too! Just... please, I ask that you recognize our community award for what it was intended to be, and make your nominating/voting decisions accordingly.
Thank you.
From the ballot itself:
Please keep in mind that the Pegasus Awards are for excellence in Filking, not in music in general, or even funny music in general. Nominated songs should be part, one way or another, of the music of the filk community, and for "Best Performer" and "Best Composer", people you nominate should be participating members of the filk community.
By the same token, voters should also be participating members of the filk community.
There are any number of amazing, delightul nerdy, geeky musicians around these days. Are those musicians members of the filk community? They are, if they consider themselves to be. If they don't consider themselves to be, then they're not.
What about you? Are you a member of the filk community? I think you are, if you consider yourself to be. We don't have a member roll, we don't have dues, we don't have a minimum time or attendance requirement, you don't have to sing or play an instrument or make an album. The highest principle we hold is that everyone is welcome and no one is excluded. You just have to genuinely want to be part of the community of people who share filk music.
It's important to remember that "filk" isn't simply a synonym for "geek music". Filk is so much more than just a genre of music. Filk is people. ("It's peeeeoplllllle!" er, ahem.)
Here's a post that I wrote a while back on the filk community, the Pegasus Awards, and what they mean to me.
From that post:
The filk community accepted me wholeheartedly over a decade ago. I had never before felt so unreservedly accepted, so welcomed, and with such a wonderful place to share music. This community means more to me than I can possibly explain, and the award is meaningful to me because of the community. I've received three Pegasus Awards, two jointly with Tony, and each one has touched me deeply because of where it comes from and what it means. The Pegasus Awards are meant to be the filk community saying to some of its members, "we honor you and your music."
...
...campaigning is likely to result in ballot-stuffing; not maliciously, but just by people who won't know it's a community award (they can't know if nobody *tells* them, after all), who see just a name and a URL and say "oh I'm a fan of X and they're up for some award I've never heard of, I'll vote for 'em, sure!" If you have already been campaigning, please consider explaining the award to your readers, and asking them to judge for themselves.
It's important to me that the Pegasus Award remain what it was intended to be: an award given by the filk community in recognition of its members. That's tricky, because membership isn't restricted, as with an organization like SFWA. The filk community isn't an official organization; it's just a community of people, open to anyone who wants to be in it, and that means the ballot has to be an open ballot, or else we'd be betraying our own principles. So we're basically on the honor system.
Let's use the Hugos as an example, because they're coming up too. Let's say I wrote a short story that's up for a Hugo. I'd be totally comfortable going on Twitter and saying "Everyone vote for my story for a Hugo because it's awesome!" Why? Because the Hugo is an award *meant* to be awarded to the work with the most SF fans who think it's awesome. Hopefully all the voters are *reading* all the entries, but given that, the Hugo is intended to be voted on by all SF fans, worldwide. There's nothing wrong with that kind of award. That's how it's defined.
I would not, however, go on Twitter and say "Everyone vote for my song for a Pegasus because it's awesome!" Because the Pegasus is not meant to be awarded to the song/band with the most fans worldwide who think it's awesome. I have fans who are not members of the filk community. If I start campaigning on the internet at large, then I may get votes from people who a) have never heard of and b) don't care about the filk community. Even if they are dutifully listening to all the song samples before voting, it's still not okay, because the Pegasus is not that kind of award and that's not how it's defined.
Those people would mean well! They'd just be trying to express their love for one musician/band! But they'd inadvertently be taking the award away from the community that created it and from its intended purpose.
The Pegasus is not an award for the nerd-band with the most fans. It's not the Grammies of geek-music. It's a community award, and it's meant to be both voted on by and bestowed upon community members. It's meant to represent the collective voice of the filk community.
If you love a geek musician's work and you're not sure whether they're filkers, then hey, why not ask them? "Do you consider yourself a member of the filk community?" If their answer is no (or if their answer is "huh?"), then please consider not nominating them for a Pegasus and not campaigning to get their fans to vote.
I believe the key here is self-identifying. Jonathan Coulton, for an obvious example, isn't a filker-- not so much because he's a professional musician, in my opinion, but because he specifically does not self-identify as a member of the filk community. (I do mean specifically. as I understand it he's been invited to filk cons and has politely declined.) Being a professional doesn't mean you're not a filker; there are lots of working musicians who are a part of the community and have been honored by it. Heather Dale & Ben Deschamps. Tom Smith. Chris Conway. Wild Mercy. Many more. Some are even in the Filk Hall of Fame (an award for long-term contributions to the filk community, not primarily in terms of performing.)
If you're not sure whether you're a filker, there's nobody to ask but yourself. I don't get to answer for you and neither does anyone else. Have you been to any filk cons or filk circles or house filks? Have you really wanted to go to one even though you haven't been able to yet? Do you hang out with, or listen to music by, or play music with, or help organize & support, people who consider themselves filkers? Do you genuinely want to be part of the filk community?
If you want to, then I say welcome! If you don't want to, then that's okay too! Just... please, I ask that you recognize our community award for what it was intended to be, and make your nominating/voting decisions accordingly.
Thank you.